False equivalence

I thought this one was quite funny…

FalseEquivalence

It’s an “argument” I’ve seen often enough, but isn’t normally phrased quite so stupidly; it normally isn’t as obvious. Just because two things share one or more qualities, and especially if those are superficial or could have different meanings if expressed with different words, does not make those two things equal.

Bad debaters tend to hide this fallacious argument behind verbose use of language, mixed metaphors and scientific jargon. The guy who shared the above normally does all three… maybe he was lazy this time.

Of course this is a false equivalence, a type of logical fallacy.

Another one that makes just as much sense, and is equally wrong, would be:

Dogs are soft and cuddly.
Cats are soft and cuddly.

Therefore cats are dogs.

Advertisements

About Jerome

I am a senior C# developer in Johannesburg, South Africa. I am also a recovering addict, who spent nearly eight years using methamphetamine. I write on my recovery blog about my lessons learned and sometimes give advice to others who have made similar mistakes, often from my viewpoint as an atheist, and I also write some C# programming articles on my programming blog.
This entry was posted in Skepticism and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s